Diclib.com
Woordenboek ChatGPT

Woordenboek opzoeken Oplossingen op maat

Voer een woord of zin in in een taal naar keuze 👆

Taal:

Vertaling en analyse van woorden door kunstmatige intelligentie ChatGPT

Op deze pagina kunt u een gedetailleerde analyse krijgen van een woord of zin, geproduceerd met behulp van de beste kunstmatige intelligentietechnologie tot nu toe:

hoe het woord wordt gebruikt
gebruiksfrequentie
het wordt vaker gebruikt in mondelinge of schriftelijke toespraken
opties voor woordvertaling
Gebruiksvoorbeelden (meerdere zinnen met vertaling)
etymologie

Wat (wie) is court of review - definitie

A MOCK COURT IN SAN FRANSCISCO, CARLIFORNIA.

Court of Historical Review and Appeal; Court of historical review

court of review

¦ noun a court before which sentences previously imposed come for revision.

Court of Historical Review

The Court of Historical Review (sometimes called the Court of Historical Review and Appeal) is a mock court in San Francisco, California. It has been convened on irregular intervals over several decades in order to decide questions of historical curiosity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_of_Historical_Review

Supreme Court Review

JOURNAL

The Supreme Court Review; Sup. Ct. Rev.; Supreme Court Rev.; Supreme Court Rev

The Supreme Court Review is an annual peer-reviewed law journal covering the legal implications of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States. It is published by the University of Chicago Press and was established in 1960.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_Review

Wikipedia

Court of Historical Review

The Court of Historical Review (sometimes called the Court of Historical Review and Appeal) is a mock court in San Francisco, California. It has been convened on irregular intervals over several decades in order to decide questions of historical curiosity. The court's judgment is purely symbolic and has no legal or academic authority. The court has been presided over by a number of actual or retired judges, including U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Hanlon and San Francisco Municipal Court Judge George T. Choppelas.

Though it is a mock court, a number of notable attorneys and civic figures have argued cases and appeared as "witnesses", sometimes in character as historical figures. The court's proceedings are described as colorful and are reported widely.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court of Historical Review

Voorbeelden uit tekstcorpus voor court of review

1. But the FISA court and the Court of Review are quite dissimilar.

2. At administration insistence, Senate negotiators agreed to steer legal rulings about the president‘s broad surveillance to the Court of Review, a little–known appeals court created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

3. A third provision would consolidate the 2' cases that have been filed in various federal district courts challenging the legality of the NSA program and give jurisdiction over them to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, which was established by FISA.

4. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review ruled that national security interests outweighed the privacy rights of those targeted, affirming what amounts to a constitutional exception for matters involving government interests "of the highest order of magnitude." The opinion, written by the court‘s chief judge, Bruce M.

5. The FISA Court of Review, the special court of appeals charged with hearing appeals of decisions by the FISA court, stated in 2002 that, quote, "[w]e take for granted that the President does have that [inherent] authority" and, "assuming that is so, FISA could not encroach on the President‘s constitutional power."'4; We do not have to decide whether, when we are at war and there is a vital need for the terrorist surveillance program, FISA unconstitutionally encroaches –– or places an unconstitutional constraint upon –– the President‘s Article II powers.'4; We can avoid that tough question because Congress gave the President the Force Resolution, and that statute removes any possible tension between what Congress said in 1'78 in FISA and the President‘s constitutional authority today.